ETF comparison · Nasdaq-100
EQQQ vs CNDX: overlap by weight, TER & holdings
Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Dist vs iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
Identical Nasdaq-100 exposure. CNDX is cheaper and accumulating; EQQQ distributes and lists more widely. Fee and dividend policy decide.
CNDX also trades as SXRV (Xetra).
EQQQ vs CNDX at a glance
| EQQQ | CNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Dist | iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) |
| ISIN | IE0032077012 | IE00B53SZB19 |
| Index | Nasdaq-100 | Nasdaq-100 |
| Market exposure | US tech-heavy | US tech-heavy |
| TER | 0.30% | 0.30% |
| Holdings in fund | 102 | 103 |
| Fund size | ≈ 9 bn USD | ≈ 18 bn USD |
| Domicile | Ireland | Ireland |
| Replication | Physical (full) | Physical (full) |
| Use of income | Distributing | Accumulating |
| Launched | Dec 2, 2002 | Jan 26, 2010 |
Top shared holdings
| EQQQ | CNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA CORP USD0.001 | 8.55% | 8.31% |
| AAPLAPPLE INC USD0.00001 | 7.84% | 7.61% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORP USD0.00000625 | 5.82% | 5.7% |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INC USD0.1 | 5.02% | 4.92% |
| AMZNAMAZON.COM INC USD0.01 | 4.33% | 4.25% |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES USD0.01 | 4% | 3.92% |
| GOOGLALPHABET INC-CL A USD0.001 | 3.23% | 3.18% |
| METAMeta Platforms INC USD0.000006 | 3.13% | 3.07% |
| GOOGALPHABET INC-CL C USD0.001 | 2.98% | 2.95% |
| TSLATESLA INC USD0.001 | 2.89% | 2.97% |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC NPV | 2.69% | 2.63% |
| INTCINTEL CORP USD0.001 | 2.39% | 2.44% |
| WMTWALMART INC USD0.1 | 2.28% | 2.22% |
| CSCOCISCO SYSTEMS INC USD0.001 | 1.89% | 1.85% |
| PLTRPALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC-A USD0.001 | 1.79% | 1.76% |
Weights per fund, normalized. 99 companies appear in both funds.
What the fee gap costs
Growth of 10,000 invested at 7% annual return, after each fund’s TER: 0.30% for EQQQ, 0.30% for CNDX.
| EQQQ | CNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| After 10 years | 19,127 | 19,127 | 0 |
| After 20 years | 36,584 | 36,584 | 0 |
| After 30 years | 69,973 | 69,973 | 0 |
The two funds charge the same TER, so fees do not separate them. TER only. Trading spreads, taxes and broker fees are not included.
Where the portfolios differ
| Region | EQQQ | CNDX |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 90.0% | 97.1% |
| China | 5.0% | 0.2% |
| Other | 2.0% | 0.0% |
| Netherlands | 3.0% | 1.1% |
| Sector | EQQQ | CNDX |
|---|---|---|
| Communication Services | 12.7% | 15.3% |
Only rows where the two funds differ by at least 1 percentage point.
Domicile and withholding tax
Both funds are domiciled in Ireland, so fund-level dividend withholding works the same way for both. Domicile does not separate this pair.
Frequently asked questions
Do EQQQ and CNDX overlap?+
Yes: 96.08% by weight, with 99 holdings appearing in both funds. 98.22% of EQQQ’s weight is also inside CNDX.
Do EQQQ and CNDX track the same index?+
Yes. Both funds track the same index: Nasdaq-100. Return differences come from fees, replication and trading costs, not from index choice.
Which is cheaper, EQQQ or CNDX?+
Neither: both charge 0.30% per year, so cost does not separate them.
Is it worth holding both EQQQ and CNDX?+
Holding both mostly duplicates exposure: 96.08% of the pair overlaps by weight. Most investors pick one, or combine one of them with a fund covering different markets.
More comparisons
Methodology
Overlap is the sum of min(weight A, weight B) across holdings that appear in both funds, with each fund’s stored weights normalized to 100%. Holdings come from issuer feeds and regulatory filings in our ETF holdings database; TER and fund size come from fund profile data and are refreshed regularly. Figures update when the underlying holdings data updates.
Holdings data as of Sep 21, 2026, from our ETF holdings database.