PGBL vs VGBL Calculator (Brazil)

Compare the two main Brazilian private-pension products side by side. Models the 12% deduction cap, regressive tax table, refund reinvestment, and both lump-sum and 15-year annuity withdrawals.

A Brazilian-specific tool

PGBL and VGBL are private-pension products only available to Brazilian residents. If you live outside Brazil and don't hold these products, you may instead want our Financial Independence Calculator or Investment Return Calculator.

If you do hold (or are considering) PGBL or VGBL, this tool computes the net wealth at withdrawal under each option, factoring in: the 12% PGBL deduction cap, the regressive tax table (35% → 10% as holding period grows), reinvestment of the IR refund, and a choice between lump-sum or 15-year monthly annuity withdrawals.

The page is also available in Portuguese, where most of our Brazilian audience lives.

Your situation

R$
R$
%

Taxes & withdrawal

%
%
Best choice for you
PGBL
PGBL leaves you R$88,078 better off
PGBL — Gross balance at exit
R$744,090
PGBL — IR refunds captured
R$66,000
PGBL — IR at withdrawal
R$105,446
PGBL — Net wealth
R$638,644
VGBL — Gross balance at exit
R$593,075
VGBL — IR at withdrawal
R$42,509
VGBL — Net wealth
R$550,566
Total contributed
R$240,000
Net wealth by year
R$0R$200,000R$300,000R$500,000R$600,00011320
PGBL
VGBL
When PGBL pulls ahead
For your inputs, PGBL overtakes VGBL starting at year 8.

Informative calculation only. Not financial advice. Your real decision depends on factors outside this calculation (income changes, IR reform, etc.).

Tips

Use the regressive table: For long horizons (10+ years) the regressive table bottoms out at 10% IR — far below the progressive table. It's the default choice for long-term private pension.
Respect the 12% cap: PGBL deduction is capped at 12% of your annual taxable gross income. Contributions above that get taxed twice — route the excess to VGBL.
Reinvest the refund: PGBL's edge only shows up when you reinvest the refund every year. If you spend the refund cash, you lose the compounding effect.
Watch out for simplified filing: Without complete filing, PGBL's benefit disappears. Confirm your itemized deductions exceed the standard deduction before choosing PGBL.
Diversify if your situation may change: If you may switch tax regimes (CLT/PJ) or have highly variable income, mixing PGBL + VGBL hedges against an unfavorable withdrawal-tax scenario.
Mind the plan fees: Loading and management fees erode returns and can wipe out the tax benefit. Compare plans before committing.

FAQ

Want to track this over time?

Create a free account to save your calculations, track your progress, and get personalized insights.

Create Free Account

Last updated: May 2026

How to Use This Calculator

The comparator runs both PGBL and VGBL scenarios in parallel, accounting for the 12% deduction cap, the regressive tax table, and refund reinvestment. To get the most out of it:

  1. Enter your monthly taxable gross income. Not your take-home pay — the figure that goes on your tax return. The calculator uses it to set your marginal IR rate and to compute the 12 × that × 0.12 PGBL deduction cap.
  2. Set your monthly contribution. The total amount you plan to put into private pension every month. The calculator handles the split: up to 12% of income flows into PGBL under the PGBL scenario, and the excess goes into a VGBL sidecar to avoid double taxation.
  3. Pick your horizon. Years until withdrawal. From 10 years on, the regressive table already hits 10% — the level where PGBL typically wins. On short horizons, VGBL is usually better.
  4. Confirm your filing method. Complete unlocks the PGBL deduction; Simplified erases the benefit entirely and the calculator forces a VGBL recommendation.
  5. Decide on refund reinvestment. Keeping it on is the honest comparison — otherwise the PGBL advantage just becomes lifestyle spending.
  6. Pick a withdrawal mode. Lump sum versus 15-year annuity changes the effective IR: in the annuity, capital keeps aging, so more of it lands in lower brackets.

The chart plots year-by-year net wealth under each strategy. The dashed vertical line marks the year PGBL overtakes VGBL in your scenario (if it does).

Key Concepts: PGBL, VGBL, and Taxation

What PGBL is and when it works

PGBL (Plano Gerador de Benefício Livre) is a Brazilian private-pension product with a specific tax regime: up to 12% of your annual taxable gross income contributed is deductible from IR, producing a refund. The trade-off is that on withdrawal, IR is paid on the full balance — contributions plus growth. So PGBL only pays off for filers using the Complete method who stay within the 12% cap and invest long enough for the regressive table to reach 10%.

What VGBL is and when it wins

VGBL (Vida Gerador de Benefício Livre) has no deduction and no cap. In exchange, withdrawal IR applies only to the growth portion, not to the contributed capital. It is the natural choice for Simplified filers, for contributions above the 12% cap, and for short withdrawal horizons.

Regressive versus progressive table

The regressive (definitive) table starts at 35% (under-2-year withdrawals) and falls 5 points every 2 years until stabilizing at 10% after 10 years — applied per contribution (FIFO), not on the balance. The progressive table uses normal monthly IR brackets (0% to 27.5%) and can be offset on the annual return. For long-horizon retirement money, the regressive table almost always wins.

Reinvesting the refund: the detail that changes everything

PGBL's mathematical edge exists mostly because the annual refund can be reinvested and compounded for decades. If you spend the refund each year, the effect vanishes and PGBL underperforms VGBL in most scenarios. The calculator turns reinvestment on by default — it's the only honest comparison.

Combining PGBL and VGBL

You don't have to pick one. High earners who contribute above 12% of annual income should split: put exactly 12% into PGBL to capture the full deduction, and route everything above that into VGBL. That captures the tax benefit without falling into the double-taxation trap on the over-cap portion.