ETF comparison · Emerging markets
EIMI vs XMME: overlap by weight, TER & holdings
iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) vs Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C
Both track MSCI emerging markets, but EIMI uses the IMI variant with thousands of small caps while XMME stops at large and mid cap. Breadth versus a slightly simpler portfolio.
EIMI vs XMME at a glance
| EIMI | XMME | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C |
| ISIN | IE00BKM4GZ66 | IE00BTJRMP35 |
| Index | MSCI EM IMI | MSCI Emerging Markets |
| Market exposure | Emerging markets (large to small cap) | Emerging markets |
| TER | 0.18% | 0.18% |
| Holdings in fund | 1,759 | 1,160 |
| Fund size | ≈ 22 bn USD | ≈ 16.5 bn USD |
| Domicile | Ireland | Ireland |
| Replication | Physical (optimized sampling) | Physical (optimized sampling) |
| Use of income | Accumulating | Accumulating |
| Launched | May 30, 2014 | Jun 21, 2017 |
Top shared holdings
| EIMI | XMME | |
|---|---|---|
| 2330TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING | 13.82% | 15.45% |
| 005930SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD | 6.39% | 7.05% |
| 000660SK HYNIX | 5.37% | 5.75% |
| 700TENCENT HOLDINGS | 2.38% | 2.75% |
| 9988ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING | 1.69% | 1.85% |
| 2454MEDIATEK | 1.56% | 1.68% |
| 005935SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE | 0.83% | 0.93% |
| 2308DELTA ELECTRONICS | 0.78% | 0.85% |
| 939CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H | 0.74% | 0.86% |
| 2317HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY | 0.69% | 0.8% |
| RELIANCERELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD | 0.52% | 0.61% |
| 402340SK SQUARE | 0.52% | 0.56% |
| 3711ASE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING | 0.49% | 0.53% |
| 1398INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF | 0.45% | 0.51% |
| 1810XIAOMI | 0.42% | 0.47% |
Weights per fund, normalized. 739 companies appear in both funds.
What the fee gap costs
Growth of 10,000 invested at 7% annual return, after each fund’s TER: 0.18% for EIMI, 0.18% for XMME.
| EIMI | XMME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| After 10 years | 19,343 | 19,343 | 0 |
| After 20 years | 37,415 | 37,415 | 0 |
| After 30 years | 72,373 | 72,373 | 0 |
The two funds charge the same TER, so fees do not separate them. TER only. Trading spreads, taxes and broker fees are not included.
Domicile and withholding tax
Both funds are domiciled in Ireland, so fund-level dividend withholding works the same way for both. Domicile does not separate this pair.
Frequently asked questions
Do EIMI and XMME overlap?+
Yes: 75.59% by weight, with 739 holdings appearing in both funds. 76.16% of EIMI’s weight is also inside XMME.
Do EIMI and XMME track the same index?+
No. EIMI tracks the MSCI EM IMI while XMME tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets. The 75.59% overlap comes from companies that both indices include.
Which is cheaper, EIMI or XMME?+
Neither: both charge 0.18% per year, so cost does not separate them.
Is it worth holding both EIMI and XMME?+
Holding both mostly duplicates exposure: 75.59% of the pair overlaps by weight. Most investors pick one, or combine one of them with a fund covering different markets.
Why does XMME hold the same companies at higher weights?+
Same companies, smaller universe: XMME spreads its weight across 1,160 holdings while EIMI holds 1,759, so each shared position takes a larger slice of XMME.
More comparisons
Methodology
Overlap is the sum of min(weight A, weight B) across holdings that appear in both funds, with each fund’s stored weights normalized to 100%. Holdings come from issuer feeds and regulatory filings in our ETF holdings database; TER and fund size come from fund profile data and are refreshed regularly. Figures update when the underlying holdings data updates.
Holdings data as of Sep 21, 2026, from our ETF holdings database.